A shortlist worth funding
The few opportunities where AI would move a number that matters in your business, ranked by value against the effort to get there.
Find the AI opportunities worth pursuing.
We help small and mid-sized businesses identify where AI can create measurable value, what foundations must change first, and which ideas should be left on the bunny hill.
This is for leaders who are being asked what their AI plan is, and who want an answer grounded in their own operations rather than a vendor roadmap.
The idea is rarely the problem. Somebody can always name a process that looks ripe for automation. What sinks the project is everything underneath it: data nobody trusts, systems that cannot be reached cleanly, a process that only works because one person remembers the exceptions.
So the work starts with your operations rather than a product demo. Which decisions are slow? Which questions take three systems and an afternoon to answer? Where does the same investigation happen every week? Those are the places AI pays, and they are specific to you.
The output is a short list you can act on, in priority order, with the honest cost of each item attached — including the ones we would tell you not to do yet.
Every candidate use case scored on business value, feasibility and what it depends on — so the sequence is defensible, not just a wish list.
Where your data, systems, processes and skills actually stand today, including the gaps that would sink a project if nobody named them.
What each opportunity needs in licensing, engineering and ongoing running cost, so the business case survives contact with finance.
What to do in the next quarter, the next year, and what to deliberately defer — with the trigger that would move something forward.
The ideas that sound good and are not worth it yet, and the specific reason why. This is usually the most valuable page.
A short executive summary written to be shown to a board or an owner, not to be translated by you first.
Understand your business, systems, processes and AI readiness.
Strengthen ERP platforms, integrations and data foundations.
Deploy AI agents where they deliver measurable value.
Implement responsible AI with security, permissions and human oversight.
Usually not. Plenty of worthwhile first projects run on the systems you already have. A data platform becomes necessary when the questions you want answered span several systems at once — and that is a conclusion the assessment should reach on evidence, not an assumption at the start.
Then that is the answer, and it is worth knowing before you spend a budget rather than after. Readiness gaps are usually specific and fixable, and knowing which three matter is more useful than a roadmap that assumes they do not exist.
A vendor assessment ends in a recommendation to buy that vendor’s product. This one can end in the recommendation to buy nothing yet, and frequently does.
Business Central already logs every turn you made. The interesting question is what it takes to make it tell you why you keep catching an edge in the same spot.
The answer is usually both — for different runs. The mistake is buying one pair of skis and expecting them to handle the whole mountain.
Everyone nods when somebody says “we should put all our data in the lake.” Almost nobody asks which lake, or what is already floating in it.
The Trailhead Assessment is a short set of questions about your systems, data and processes. It ends with a practical map of what to modernize, what to automate, and what to leave alone.
The few opportunities where AI would move a number that matters in your business, ranked by value against the effort to get there.
Where your systems, data and processes stand today, and what has to change before anything ambitious will hold up.
What to do first, what to defer and what to decline, with the reasoning written down so it survives the next vendor pitch.
Twelve questions, about five to seven minutes, and an instant read across business readiness, ERP and systems, data readiness and AI governance.